Incredible. My daughter’s nose-to-nose while the bear chews a stick right now.
Moments later, we watched in awe as the bear stunned a fish and then dragged it up to the rocks to enjoy a fresh sake feast. Crows followed on cleanup duty.
Incredible. My daughter’s nose-to-nose while the bear chews a stick right now.
Moments later, we watched in awe as the bear stunned a fish and then dragged it up to the rocks to enjoy a fresh sake feast. Crows followed on cleanup duty.
Saying that this is a courageous act that “will change forever the way that the nation views our community’s struggle for equality,” NCLR Legal Director Shannon Minter blogged yesterday about the Obama administration’s decision to not defend DOMA’s Section 3. Minter minces no words about how important this moment is and anticipates this move will have ramifications in all areas of our lives.
Today in a conference call, Minter explained that although Congress can, if it wants to, intervene as a defender of DOMA, he was not concerned about that possibility. Apparently the prior official congressional record is full of appalling statements disapproving of “immoral and sinful” gay people. Congress can go ahead and try to litigate for DOMA on the basis of gay people being wrong, but when at last it is clear that this is the sole remaining — and discriminatory — leg such defense stands upon, we head towards the full light of day at last on this road to equality.

Early 3D prototyping: a book from the 1570's
I was happy to attend Edward Tufte’s excellent class Presenting Data and Information on December 6 in San Francisco. The New York Times calls him “The Leonardo da Vinci of data.” Says Wired about the course: “One visionary day….the insights of this class lead to new levels of understanding both for creators and viewers of visual displays.”
One thing I loved was his notion that you know you have a good design when you’ve got people all having different experiences because of it – like it’s the cacaphony that’s the success, instead of passive silence. To him, the sign of a good data graphic is when everyone is thinking different things, asking questions and interacting, evoking different experiences and cognitive style. Saying things like “What’s missing is…” Once again this makes me feel like the diversity itself is the key, and if you let people “be who they are” by whatever you do, everyone wins.
I also loved that he brought Galileo to the mix, and lingered on the importance of Galileo’s visual evidence of the sun spots – which ultimated rocked our world in the most profound way. Before Galileo: Wordy Authority; After Galileo: Evidence. Tufte makes the analogy here to the importance of good visual design as evidence itself. For the first time, the earth moves — with visible certainty. Tufte also passed around an original print of a 1570s book (I didn’t catch which one, because I was dumbly fumbling with my camera) that you could say demonstrates early 3D prototyping. So how far have we really come in several centuries?
Below are some of the other highlights I got out of it.
He spent some time dwelling on the human eye-brain system while lamenting what we have done to “dumb-down” the vastly superior capabilities of this system. “We can process tons of information visually, so how come our graphics look like cartoons?”
And then he did.