<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where I Stand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike E</title>
		<link>http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moyawatson.com/?p=525#comment-194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moya, while the decision is not going to rank in the greatest things to happen in 2009 it is but a small setback in road to equality. As Ronny said, the ask is not for special handling, just to be equal in the eyes of the law. If I look back, all civil rights movement hit speed bumps along the way to achieving their true goal. When we do succeed I hope it will be with such a logical mind shift in the majority that people will quickly look back and say &quot;what were people thinking back then?&quot; like they do now with women/minority voting, interracial marriages, barring from immigration based on ethnicity, etc.
One bright side in the ruling is that the courts will stand by the law - you are legally married and it will always be recognized. Now we need to get marriage equality for everyone into law – not just the 18,000 lucky ones. Keep your chin up. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moya, while the decision is not going to rank in the greatest things to happen in 2009 it is but a small setback in road to equality. As Ronny said, the ask is not for special handling, just to be equal in the eyes of the law. If I look back, all civil rights movement hit speed bumps along the way to achieving their true goal. When we do succeed I hope it will be with such a logical mind shift in the majority that people will quickly look back and say &#8220;what were people thinking back then?&#8221; like they do now with women/minority voting, interracial marriages, barring from immigration based on ethnicity, etc.<br />
One bright side in the ruling is that the courts will stand by the law &#8211; you are legally married and it will always be recognized. Now we need to get marriage equality for everyone into law – not just the 18,000 lucky ones. Keep your chin up. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moya</title>
		<link>http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moyawatson.com/?p=525#comment-190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@leanne &lt;3

@ronny thanks so much for stopping by and for the comment -- yes, the existing marriages (of which ours is one out of 18,000) are still valid.  the decision went like this:
6-1 upholding prop 8
7-0 keeping marriages valid

so, while nice that it was unanimous about the marriages, the 6-1 ruling really stings and is a huge disappointment, especially since those who authored such beautiful language last year flipped this year.  plus, while i value our marriage, i can&#039;t rest until this injustice is addressed.

see leanne&#039;s great pics of today -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwaldal/sets/72157618837690996/

see an interview of me on sf weekly -- http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/05/moya_watsonwatson_on_the_right.php]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@leanne &lt;3</p>
<p>@ronny thanks so much for stopping by and for the comment &#8212; yes, the existing marriages (of which ours is one out of 18,000) are still valid.  the decision went like this:<br />
6-1 upholding prop 8<br />
7-0 keeping marriages valid</p>
<p>so, while nice that it was unanimous about the marriages, the 6-1 ruling really stings and is a huge disappointment, especially since those who authored such beautiful language last year flipped this year.  plus, while i value our marriage, i can&#039;t rest until this injustice is addressed.</p>
<p>see leanne&#039;s great pics of today -<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwaldal/sets/72157618837690996/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwaldal/sets/72157618837690996/</a></p>
<p>see an interview of me on sf weekly &#8212; <a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/05/moya_watsonwatson_on_the_right.php" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/05/moya_watsonwatson_on_the_right.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronny Hendrickx</title>
		<link>http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronny Hendrickx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moyawatson.com/?p=525#comment-189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same here Moya. By you and everyone else who just want - not more and not less - what others can have without any fight.
I hope that today&#039;s decision is at half good news that the existing marriages are still valid -(as I understand it.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here Moya. By you and everyone else who just want &#8211; not more and not less &#8211; what others can have without any fight.<br />
I hope that today&#8217;s decision is at half good news that the existing marriages are still valid -(as I understand it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leanne</title>
		<link>http://moyawatson.com/2009/05/25/where-i-stand/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leanne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moyawatson.com/?p=525#comment-188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

